Anyone looking for a definitive answer to the question about the outlook for the 2009 real-estate market need look no further than Inman News to see why one isn't in the offing.

In the afternoon edition of today's Inman "Daily Headlines," the first two items are "Pessimism about 2009 recovery," which outlines and refers readers to an Inman survey of expectations for the 2009 market, and "Get ready for real-estate rebound," which outlines the reasons the market could improve next year.

Take a read of both. Let me know which side you come down on -- that of survey respondents who say a rebound won't happen before 2010 or that of columnist Bernice Ross, who says next year will be better than anyone thinks. (I'm crossing my fingers that Ross is right, but I'm afraid those fingers will cramp up before I can uncross them and we're in the clear.)

I got an e-mail recently from Dave Erickson, past president of the Washington Association of Mortgage Brokers, who wants prospective homebuyers to know that there's mortgage money out there and rates have been going in the right direction for borrowers. Here's his e-mail:

Did you know? Rates have fallen around 1% for a 30 year rate over the last couple weeks.

If you do the math, a 1% drop, from 6.375% to 5.375%, on a 300,000 mortgage reduces the payment by $191.70. At 5.375%, $191.70 buys an extra $34,233.90 in house. Compelling, isn’t it? Add to that the 10-20% price drops which have already occurred and it’s really compelling. It is a great time to buy.

Cindy, also I’d like to try to counter the common perception that it is hard to get a mortgage these days. It simply isn’t true. If you have income that can be verified, okay credit, and aren’t buying over your head, there is plenty of money readily available to you. I recently have gotten multiple approvals for debt ratios over 50% for first time buyers.

Let’s not dissuade those first timers who are on the border of affording a home of their own. When rates go up (they certainly will) and when values start back up (they always have and will again), these people may be out of luck.

So, what I'd like to know is this: Have you gotten a loan recently? How long did it take?

This is one of those weeks when home-sales reports make my head spin around. Three reports came out Monday; one, yesterday; and one, today. That I know of. There are probably more I don't know about. I'm sure some of you can keep them straight, but for the rest of you -- and mostly me -- I'll recap and give you a little insight about each report.

Released Monday:

-- National Association of Realtors reported existing-home sales. This is one of those reports that means little to our market. The NAR doesn't break out data for our area because the Northwest Multiple Listing Service, which tracks our sales, isn't affiliated with the national organization. And our MLS, which releases its data for each month early the following month, doesn't separate sales of new and existing homes. In other words, this report tell us nothing about the Seattle-area market. We combined the AP story about this report with one about the next report. See the AP story here.

-- The Associated Press-Re/Max Monthly Housing Report addressed October home sales. I actually never see this report, just the Associated Press stories about it. (If you know where to find it, please let me know because I'd love to get my hands on it.) This report covers sales of new and existing homes nationwide and by region. It bothers me because the data for our region, the West, is heavily skewed by ridiculously high foreclosure rates and plummeting prices in California, Nevada and Arizona. In other words, although we run the AP coverage of the report (see Tuesday's here), I get neither excited nor hot and bothered about it. When I see a Seattle area or even Washington state breakdown, I'll jump up and down.

-- Real Trends reported its October home-sales numbers (new and resales). This report also looked at the nation as a whole and at several regions. Nothing more detailed (I called to ask), so -- again -- not particularly helpful in individual markets. It reported changes in average, not median, prices, which means that unless extreme highs and lows are thrown out, the price data can be easily skewed. This one we didn't write about, and no wire services we use covered it, either. Here are the first two paragraphs of the Real Trends news release:

Home sales decreased 4.8 percent nationwide in October 2008 over October 2007 in what real-estate information firm Real Trends calls a "sloppy bottom" -- results that vary significantly from one month to the next.

The strongest region was the West where home sales increased 33.3 percent from October 2007. The hardest-hit regions were the Northeast, which had held up better throughout the downturn that started in July 2005, where unit sales decreased 16.8 percent, and the South, which saw unit sales decrease by 17.1 percent from the same month a year ago.

Released Tuesday:

-- The biggie, which people in the industry seem to either love or hate (I'm not a big fan), was the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller 10- and 20-city home-price indexes. The Seattle metro area is in the 20-city index, so we watch that one. It looks at the changes in price over time of the same homes, factoring out significant changes that would skew the price change. Elizabeth Rhodes wrote a story about this report.

Released today:

-- The U.S. Commerce Department released its report on new-home sales for October.

Stay tuned. Next week, the Northwest Multiple Listing Service releases it's November home-sales data. And while that data leaves out any sale not reported to the MLS, it's the best, most complete look we have for our market on a monthly basis.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are suspending foreclosures for the holiday season -- Nov. 26 through Jan. 9 -- while lenders ready a new loan-modification program aimed at preventing reducing the number of foreclosures by allowing homeowners to refinance into loans with more favorable terms.

The two government-sponsored enterprises own or guarantee $5.2 trillion of the $12 trillion U.S. home mortgage market, Bloomberg News says. Read the full story here.

The Comptroller of the Currency (I want a cool title like that) sent out this press release. Seems that the man himself, John Dugan, defended the 31-year-old Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) yesterday in a speech to the Enterprise Annual Network Conference in Baltimore.

Dugan was the latest to weigh in on the debate about whether this legislation caused the subprime mortgage crisis, the catalyst for our current economic woes. The CRA was passed in 1977 to encourage banks to lend in low- and moderate-income areas. It specifically says "consistent with safe and sound operation." I take that to mean: "Don't lend to those who can't pay you back" and "Don't make special exceptions for those with questionable credit and limited ability to repay a loan."

But hey, what do I know?

Thank God. Windermere Real Estate finally upgraded its Web site, and I, for one, am grateful.

The upgrade makes it easy to "cruise" a neighborhood to check out its listings. You can zoom in to check out listing in a particular area you might like to call home. After you plug in search criteria, you get a page that has a map with lots of houses on it. Roll your cursor over a house to see a thumbprint photo and the address, then go to the listings on the right side to read details, see more photos or watch a slide show.

I peruse lots of real-estate Web sites, and I like this one.

No, not this writer. I'm talking about columnist Jon Lansner, who writes about real estate at the Orange County Register.

He says the government should double the mortgage-interest deduction, which would give homeowners a $2 deduction for every $1 they pay in mortgage interest. Check it out here.

What's your idea to stimulate the housing market?

"Kung Fu Panda" was not available at my local video store, and I couldn't watch "Stick It" or "Over the Hedge" again, so I had to rent something else for a Saturday move night. The famiy-oriented choices were slim, and I settled for the only one I could find: "Kit Kittredge: An American Girl."

Sweet movie, really, but it scared the crap out of me. About a girl's life during The Great Depression, the movie is kid-friendly, based on the American Girl line of dolls and books -- and deals with topics that are very much adult-oriented: job loss, foreclosure, soup kitchens, homeless camps, "hobos" and the prejudice they faced.

Honestly, though, with the fear and loathing in the stock market, the housing market and the economy in general, I should've reconsidered. When Kit's friends' house was foreclosed on, I flinched. The family's possessions were carried out to the sidewalk and the foreclosure sign was pounded into the ground. I bit my lip watching it. I will be unemployed as of mid-December (I'm leaving voluntarily as part of a companywide staff reduction), and this innocent movie brought all my fears about unemployment, especially in a recession, and foreclosure to the forefront of mind.