Welcome to Microsoft Pri0: That's Microspeak for top priority, and that's the news and observations you'll find here from Seattle Times reporter Sharon Chan.
July 14, 2008 11:55 AM
Posted by Benjamin J. Romano
Yahoo had the stage itself on Sunday to tell the story of Microsoft's latest proposal, which it rejected. But Microsoft fired back this morning with its own account of the last-ditch deal effort that went down starting Thursday.
Update, 12:33 p.m.: Carl Icahn is also out with another letter to Yahoo shareholders disputing Yahoo's account.
In a statement, Microsoft disputed elements of Yahoo's account.
For starters, Microsoft says it submitted the new search-only proposal, late Friday, at the request of Yahoo Chairman Roy Bostock, "as a result of apparent attempts by Mr. Icahn to have Microsoft and Yahoo! engage on a search transaction on terms Mr. Icahn believed Microsoft would be willing to accept and which Microsoft understands Mr. Icahn had discussed with Yahoo!."
Here's the rest of the statement:
Specifically, on Thursday afternoon, July 10, Mr. Bostock called Steve Ballmer's office to arrange a call. On that subsequent call, Mr. Bostock told Mr. Ballmer that "with substantial guarantees on the table and an increase in the TAC (traffic acquisition cost) rate, there are the pillars of a search only deal to be done." Mr. Bostock encouraged Mr. Ballmer to submit a new proposal to Yahoo! for a search only deal reflecting these terms.
After considering Yahoo's request and taking into account Yahoo's previous feedback about our prior search proposal, Microsoft determined late Friday to propose an enhanced search transaction. This proposal included significant revenue guarantees, higher TAC rates, an equity investment and an option for Yahoo! to extend the agreement over a 10 year period.
Microsoft's proposal did not include changes to Yahoo's governance.
At the time Microsoft submitted its enhanced proposal, Microsoft asked that Yahoo! confirm whether it would agree that the enhancements were sufficient to form the basis for the parties to engage in negotiations over the weekend on a letter of intent and more detailed term sheets. This discussion has been mischaracterized as a take it or leave it ultimatum, rather than a timetable in order to move forward to intensive negotiations. Yahoo! informed Microsoft on Saturday that it had rejected the proposal.
Posted by fukmefuku
6:25 PM, Jul 14, 2008
get a room already..wtf..been dancing all night..lets get it over with it..
Posted by Just Checking
8:09 PM, Jul 14, 2008
Why doesn't Microsoft bug off???? Not everyone likes them. How much money do they have to make each year. How much is ENOUGH??
Posted by l8rhoo
9:26 PM, Jul 14, 2008
Ha.. good bye Yahoo... Your going down and if someone doesn't pick up you, MS will for a fraction of the current offer, if they are still interested in anything you have to offer. Your employees will likely be gone to better jobs by then... Your CEO and board are smoking something..
Posted by Check again
10:59 PM, Jul 14, 2008
In response to Just Checking. In business there is never enough. Businesses seek to maximize growth and profits in perpetuity. Wealth creation is the name of the game, Corporate America is neither altruistic nor your friend. That should be obvious.
Posted by rmadal iraq
9:35 AM, Jul 20, 2008
Jul 18, 08 - 03:02 PM
Former Microsoft employee gets 22 months for fraud scheme
Jul 18, 08 - 11:42 AM
U.S. search market share trend reversed in June: Google down, Microsoft and Yahoo up
Jul 18, 08 - 10:10 AM
Microsoft shares fall after earnings news, analysts react
Jul 17, 08 - 03:38 PM
Wii passes Xbox 360 in total U.S. sales
Jul 17, 08 - 01:22 PM
Microsoft, too, misses Wall Street earnings estimate, but just by a penny
Furniture & home furnishings
Adorable, Super Tiny AKC Male Yorkie Puppy
AKC French Bulldogs
Australian Shepherd pups - Reg. Full, mini ...
POST A FREE LISTING
Bill Gates, who last week ended his full-time involvement with Microsoft, was often right. He made a career, a company and an industry by looking over the horizon.