Welcome to Microsoft Pri0: That's Microspeak for top priority, and that's the news and observations you'll find here from Seattle Times reporter Sharon Chan.
April 2, 2008 4:15 PM
Posted by Benjamin J. Romano
Readers more familiar with Microsoft's Employee Stock Purchase Program than I am pointed out a better way to evaluate the data the company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this week. I wrote that Microsoft employees, per capita, bought fewer shares of stock through the program in each of the past two years.
A better measure is how much they spent on Microsoft stock through the program, since employees elect to put a certain percentage of their paycheck toward the program; they don't designate a specific number of shares they'd like to buy. Their spending, too, has declined.
Microsoft employee spending on the ESPP during the past three years was as follows:
2007: $5,857.41 per employee
2006: $5,906.37 per employee
2005: $6,425.96 per employee
I calculated this by dividing the total employee contribution for each year, as reported in this SEC filing, and dividing it by the number of employees Microsoft reported on June 30 of each year (listed here). Further scrutiny is welcome.
As you can see, the trend is in the same direction I identified in the earlier post. While the decline from 2006 to 2007 is not that big, what about the drop from 2005 to 2006?
As several readers noted, it's hard to imagine why an employee who can afford to wouldn't participate in the program. Even the most bearish employee can get an immediate 10 percent gain each quarter by selling their shares the day after they acquire them at 90 percent of market price through the program.
One suggestion is the average Microsoft salary could be decreasing as the number of international hires increases. That's speculation and I don't have data on U.S. vs. ex-U.S. Microsoft salaries. But we do know that Microsoft has been adding employees outside the U.S. at a faster rate (14.5 percent for the 12-months ended last July 2007) than its employment growth overall (10.6 percent for the same period).
Also, I think it's fair to assume that regardless of regional salary differences, the types of jobs Microsoft is adding overseas are skewing toward lower-paying sales and marketing functions rather than the core product development work, much of which is still done in Redmond (though even those functions are performed globally). Recall that more than 60 percent of Microsoft's sales now come from international markets, executives said at the company's most-recent quarterly earnings report.
Posted by anonymous
9:15 AM, Apr 04, 2008
You might also consider general spending/dept in the economy. Maybe employees want more money upfront for spending versus putting it away for short-term over the last few years. How does this rate with other companies and in general around putting salaries into "savings" types of accounts?
As a comment stated in your previous post, why would employees give up a 10% gain on their money in such a short time? It doesn't add up.
Jul 1, 08 - 11:45 AM
Microsoft buying natural-language search company Powerset
Jun 30, 08 - 05:16 PM
Report: Microsoft to cut Xbox 360 price ahead of big industry event
Jun 27, 08 - 03:52 PM
Gates send-off: Gates has had Ballmer's back from the beginning
Jun 27, 08 - 01:09 PM
Gates send-off: Photos
Jun 27, 08 - 11:48 AM
Gates send-off: Two guys and 90,000 employees
(General Motors) GM opens racing center General Motors recently opened the doors on its new 111,420-square-foot GM Powertrain Performance and Racing C...
Post a comment
Bill Gates, who last week ended his full-time involvement with Microsoft, was often right. He made a career, a company and an industry by looking over the horizon.