Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Politics & Government


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Politics Northwest

The Seattle Times political team explores state, regional and local politics.

RSS feeds Subscribe | Blog Home

February 3, 2009 12:06 PM

Bill would require police to take DNA from those arrested

Posted by Jennifer Sullivan

A Federal Way lawmaker wants to expand the state's DNA identification system by requiring that police take a DNA sample from suspects at the time of arrest.

Rep. Mark Miloscia, D-Federal Way, presented his bill before the House Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Committee this morning, saying it would help police solve crimes. Federal Way Police Cmdr. Stan McCall testified in support of the bill.

"This bill would take the next step in the use of DNA technology; to help catch individuals who have gone out and harmed people," Miloscia said, adding that 15 states already take DNA from suspects at the time of arrest.

Legislatures across the nation are debating the issue. Currently, Washington state collects DNA from people convicted of felonies and many misdemeanor sex crimes after they are sentenced. The sample usually is taken by swabbing the inside of a person's cheek.

The ACLU and state criminal defense organizations testified against the bill, saying it would violate a suspect's constitutional right to privacy.

Miloscia's proposal would require law enforcement to take samples from all adults and juveniles arrested for a felonies or a gross misdemeanor. He said the proposal would be costly, but the state could apply for federal money. A fiscal note attached to the measure said it is unclear how much the measure would cost. The fiscal note said that a portion of the cost would be paid for by a DNA database fee charged to convicted criminals.

House lawmakers today also heard from Jayann Sepich, the mother of a New Mexico murder victim. Sepich campaigns across the country for laws allowing for DNA to be taken at the time of arrest.

"We take fingerprints, we take mug shots and we don't take DNA. I watched CSI I knew what can be done with DNA," Sepich testified.

Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine

Comments (91)
we should start by getting the DNA of all elected officials first.  Posted on February 3, 2009 at 12:40 PM by tregare. Jump to comment
I'd be OK with this after a CONVICTION. And really, it should only be for a conviction for a violent offense or felony. Jaywalkers should...  Posted on February 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM by serendipitist. Jump to comment
My issue with this is that they want to take it at the time of an arrest, not after a conviction which is currently done. (please read the article...  Posted on February 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM by 47Ronin. Jump to comment

Advertising

Marketplace

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Categories
Calendar

May

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Browse the archives

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

November 2008

Contributors

Andrew Garber
Covers politics and state government from Olympia.

Jennifer Sullivan
Covers the state Legislature from Olympia.

Chantal Anderson
Covers the state Legislature from Olympia.

Emily Heffter
Writes about the city of Seattle and local politics.

Mike Lindblom
Covers transportation.

Jim Brunner
Writes about money and power from Seattle.