Nigel, I am glad that you can site evidence such as the constitution for your argument. It makes a good point, but I do not think that is the main point to think about regarding CBS’ decision to limit political ads.
Like Nigel, I agree with CBS’s decision -- but for different reasons. The Super Bowl is a sporting event, no matter how you look at it. Yes, it also is the pinnacle for advertisements...but above all else, it is a football game. Sports are an outlet away from politics and I believe they should be kept separate. Look at what happened when ESPN tried to mix politics and sports by adding Rush Limbaugh. There should be no political ads at all during sporting events.
I question whether or not CBS should air the White House sponsored, “Anti-drug” ad. In my mind all those anti-drug commercials are extreme exaggerations, more humorous than convincing. However many can agree that there are problems with drugs, and the only true controversy of those commercials is how lame they are.
John, here is something simple for you to do if you are upset with Viacom and CBS: Instead of attacking Nigel, don’t watch TV and don’t watch CBS. Just like a private company you can make your own decisions.
The Super Bowl should be enjoyed for the prestigious game that it is. True fans could care less what ads are shown or what channel it’s broadcasted on. But I would rather hear controversy about a bad call, or bad coaching decision, rather then some lame anti-Bush ad or any other political ad.
Respond to this posting
Back to top