Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Mariners


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Mariners Blog

Geoff Baker covers the Mariners for The Seattle Times. He provides daily coverage of the team throughout spring training, and during the season.

E-mail Geoff| Mariners Forum| RSS feeds Subscribe | Blog Home

November 29, 2007 7:52 AM

Trading season underway

Posted by Geoff Baker

Good morning to all of you on one of those cool and overcast (for now) days. As many of you have already heard, that six-player swap between the Twins and Rays is now official. One of you asked me about my reasoning behind grading certain prospects as more proven than others. In the case of outfielder Delmon Young, now with the Twins, versus Matt Garza, newly of the Rays, it's pretty simple. Young played all 162 games as a rookie for the Rays last season, batting in the middle of the order at age 21 -- all without the benefit of any Class AAA experience behind him.

To that end, he hit 13 homers, drove in 93 runs and hit .288. I'm well aware that he hit into plenty of outs and that his on-base-plus-slugging percentage was barely above .700. But you have to remember that, very often, young power hitters need time to find their stroke, not to mention plate discipline. It can often take years, which is worth remembering in the case of Adam Jones -- though the latter has mastered Class AAA pitching, which gives him a big leg-up.

Young reminds me a little of the way Alex Rios was when rushed to the majors by Toronto in 2004 without any Class AAA experience. Took him a couple of full seasons before his power stroke kicked in and his OPS went up from the low .700s.

In Young's case, he's even younger than Rios was and appears to have adapted to major league pitching much more quickly. The last rookie to play all 162 games was Hideki Matsui of the Yankees and we all know that he was much older and had years of seasoning as a Japanese professional.

Garza was one of the top pitchers in minor league baseball in 2006 but has yet to throw even 100 innings in the majors. That his ERA was lower than 4.00 last season bodes well for his future while his 2-to-1 strikeouts-to-walks ratio was also good, if not off-the-charts the way it was in the minors. He also allowed tons of baserunners, in a very Miguel Batista fashion. The jury is still out on whether Garza will become a No. 1 or No. 2 guy or a mid-rotation mainstay like Batista. We may not know the answer for years.

That's where Young appears to have the early edge. He's gotten his feet wet in the majors, nearly drove in 100 while playing every game and hitting mostly in the fifth spot in the order. Very few 21-year-olds can do that. In fact, Baseball Reference lists Tris Speaker as the historical hitter most comparable to Young at his age. Not bad.

Naturally, the reaction to this deal in Tampa Bay has been somewhat muted.

Here's what the cautious John Romano had to say in the St. Petersburg Times.

"In the end, the Rays have traded a potential superstar for a very good pitcher and a serviceable shortstop. It's certainly a subjective argument, but it doesn't feel like enough on a gut-level reaction."

Over in Minneapolis, they're already saying Young's numbers next season will be better than those of Torii Hunter, who recently left the Twins as a free-agent and signed with the Los Angeles Angels. This was the first major deal by new Twins GM Bill Smith.

"We think his power is going to continue to improve," Smith said of Young in a conference call with reporters last night. "He's going to be a middle-of-the-order difference maker in our lineup."

Time will tell. Where does Seattle outfielder Jones fit into all this? Not sure. He has nowhere near the level of big league experience that both Young and Garza already have. We know less of where Jones is going to be as a big league performer in a couple of seasons than we do of either Young or Garza. We can try to guess, based off minor league statistics. But we would be guessing. With Young and Garza, both have shown they can contribute at the major league level over something close to a full season. They still have a long way to go, but both are already off to pretty good starts -- Young moreso than Garza. We'll know after this year how much room for improvement Jones has. But he's a year behind those other two at this moment. So, hopefully that explains a little of the difference in some of my labeling of the young talent being traded or talked about. Hopefully, it wasn't too confusing.

As far as the M's go, the Garza-Young deal means the Twins will definitely be looking for another young starter in any Johan Santana package. Minnesota also is unlikely to have any room left for outfielder Craig Monroe, acquired just weeks ago. The corner outfielder put up some Jose Guillen-like numbers with the Tigers in 2006 before slumping this past season. For those of you wondering who would play the outfield for Seattle if Jones were to be traded to the Twins in a Santana package, this could possibly be part of the answer.

But there's a long way to go for the M's on the Santana front.

In a more realistic acquisition scenario, the competition for Japanese pitcher Hiroki Kuroda is heating up big-time. The Dodgers are now in the fray, along with Seattle, Kansas City and Arizona. From the Long Beach Press Telegram story, it's apparent the M's weren't the only team that sent a delegation to Japan (why this would surprise anyone is beyond me, but there you have it).

Does the KC signing yesterday of reliever Yasuhiko Yubuta make Kuroda any more likely to sign with the Royals? Who knows? But it didn't sound yesterday like the hurler was any closer to a decision after his agent, Steve Hilliard, apprised him of the situation at a meeting in Hiroshima, Japan.

"Right now, I haven't decided anything," Kuroda told a Japanese newspaper. "Teams are on a line. Steve explained a lot to me, including (the) environment I am concerned about. I'll take time to think about my future."

So, there you have it. It's going to be an interesting week at the winter meetings in Nashville. If you thought the cost of starting pitchers -- mediocre or otherwise -- was ridiculous a year ago, just wait to see what happens over the next week.


Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine

Submit a comment

*Required Field



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Posted by Chris from Bothell (used to be Duvall)

8:57 AM, Nov 29, 2007

How do RRS and Morrow look so far this winter, as trade fodder? And how do they look so far as candidates for #5 starter job? I don't know if those are necessarily 2 seperate questions, but it feels like it to me.

Still think Jones, Clement and Beltre for Santana is reasonable, provided a) one could get someone like Tejada for 3rd base and b) Santana can be enticed by 20mil for 7 yrs, working with Stottlemyre, mentoring Felix, and feasting on the AL West for a good part of the year. I'd think more would be made of that last bit; his numbers against the AL West looked pretty good IIRC.

Posted by ChrisP (used to be Arod's mom)

9:44 AM, Nov 29, 2007

Santana and another starting pitcher would be great, no doubt we need to bolster that rotation. The one thing that concerns me is nobody has been talking about strengthening our bullpen. Even if we have 2 studs at the top of the rotation, we need to ease the burden on Mr. Putz and keep him from those multi inning saves. Geoff, do you see any options out there that can help us shorten things up to a 6 inning game? Thanks.

Posted by DR.J

9:56 AM, Nov 29, 2007

Glad to be getting going again.

Think the Minnesota/Tampa trade is really interesting and brings up that some "mid-" or even lower level teams are not planning on rolling over to play the roll of a minor leagu practice team to the likes of Boston and New York.

Puts more emphasis, in my mind, on the Mariners either getting active or sliding even further down. I love the new coaching staff ( except Jeff Petland whom I don't see as helping particualrly if you look at the likes of Richie Sexon among others).And coaches don't hit and field.

I am trying not to get my hopes up, however, as Bavasi disappoints time and time again.................trying to "out clever" himself. Looking for an angle and a bargain.

The Mariners persuit of the Japanese pitcher (is it Kuroda?) makes sense but other teams are after him as well and have resources. Bavasi is likely to underestimate what other teams will do.

And I don't see him doing much elese really .......possibly cosmetic but no serious reach for the ring.

Unless he finds a clever way to get rid of Sexon ( I doubt he is that clever), we are stuck. The obvious move is to get rid of him somehow, put Ibanez at first and one of the rookie fielders in the outfield. And it doesn't have to be Jones. In fact, I am not sold on Jones and have seen him play poorly in the field, strike out alot and have bad attitude.I like Balentin and Mike MOrse in addititon to Clement and these players seem close to the majors.

........and finally, when I hear Bavasi say that he still has hope for Horacio Ramirez.....................it makes me kind of sick. Here we go again. He has manged to bury Chris Reitsma ( total flop), Weaver ( what can you say........massive headcase in addition to Ramirez.

So there are many moves possible but it is a long way off considering where we are now

Posted by MJ

9:59 AM, Nov 29, 2007

Geoff's blog is back, the first rite of Spring arrives!

I have a couple of questions?
*Will the M's look to move the Big Sexy and his fat contract or is there no market even if they are willing to pick up a ton, a couplle of k's on opening day and the Boo Birds could break him in my opinion.
*Santana is the big catch and the M's should move Jones, Morrow, whoever to get him but are there any indications they want to and if not what is Billy boys big plans? I haven't heard one national outlet talk about the M's being a player in that. I have heard Willis who I actually like if the price is right. David Riske local kid, could help if Morrow moves.

Posted by Lance

10:59 AM, Nov 29, 2007

CFB, Morrow has been looking very good in Winter Ball. In his first two starts he's been going about five innings and giving up no more than a run or two. Walks are also way down. I can only believe he'll just get better and better.
.
IMHO, Morrow should be viewed much more than trade fodder. He's a guy with TOR stuff for the M's rotation for years, and other teams know this. He and Felix would make a great TOR duo, and as soon as sometime in 2008. I'd be very reluctant to deal him for anyone not named Johan. That includes any available Erics out there.
.
And with guys like Chris Tillman, Tony Butler, Juan Ramirez, and Phillippe Aumont, and a few who could really surprise like Robert Rohrbaugh or Justin Thomas, the future looks bright for the M's rotation. Of course, some will falter, get hurt, or be moved. But, if just a couple come through to compliment Felix and Brandon that would be fantastic.
.
RRS also looked very solid in his Winter League stint. Most likely he'll begin '08 as a starter in Tacoma. But he's already well ahead of Feierabend at this point, in my opinion. Long term, and not that far down the line, he'd make a very solid BOR lefty in the mold of Detroit's Nate Robertson. Possibly even better. Maybe it's the "glasses" thing. However, his trade value may be minimal until he actually gets himself more established at the major league level.

Posted by Lance

11:09 AM, Nov 29, 2007

MJ, so you're aware, a guy from Minnesota who was talking on KJR this morning said that to his knowledge Bavasi HAD spoken to the Twins' GM about Santana. But, nothing more was said about it. So, apparantly it's not like the M's are staying out of the Santana sweepstakes altogether. However, nothing that was worth creating a rumor over. Not at this point, anyway.
.
The guy from Minnesota did feel Santana would be dealt within a couple of weeks, but that was just his opinion.
.
Maybe Geoff will be able to dig up something along those lines. I'm sure he's digging.

Posted by M's Defender

12:09 PM, Nov 29, 2007

The Twins are preparing the club for the two big trades they must do for the good of the team:
1)The trade of Johan Santana
2)The trade of Joe Nathan
and both for the same reason due to salary demands to sign any extension deal and the fact they are both FA after the '08 season.
By this trade with the Rays the Twins have address fully the loss of Torii Hunter.

The Twins are expecting a package of players which include MLB ready pitching from who ever wins the Santana sweepstakes.

According to ESPN the most likely winner will be the Yankees while the Mets will be the most motivated to aquire him but Boston will be the dark horse in that they are as usual trying to stop the Yankees from getting him.

In a way I like the idea of the Yankees getting him because the cost in prospects and young players will be very high because of the competition with Boston,the Mets,and the Angels.

Anything that drains the already weak farm system the Yankees have and emptys their wallet that much more I'm for cause of the effect in the long run.

The Twins will also be asking a high price in talent for any team who becomes a suitor for closer Joe Nathan so look for the Twins have a lot of holes and weaknesses closed up and shored up by ST.
I just wish Bavasi could do a third of what the Twins are doing with the pieces they having to move.
So many weak points and holes both on the MLB roster and MiLB system of the M's would be filled and shored up to wher the M's could count on the MiLB system to deliver the goods in MLB ready players that can literally fill the shoes of any player on the field.

Posted by scrapiron

12:39 PM, Nov 29, 2007

I think the latest Twins trade takes the Mariners out of the Santana sweepstakes. The Twins are now looking for young pitching and a third baseman. The M's won't part with Beltre, and other teams like the Yankees (Chamberlain) have better pitching to offer.


What this does show is that the Rays now have a stockpile of young pitching, and the Mariners should be talking to them about picking up one of those. I'm thinking Balentien for Howell is a deal that could work. Another team with an abundance of pitching is the Giants, and they might even have some interest in Sexson if we eat most of the salary. How about Sexson, Balentien and cash for Lowry? I'd even throw in Clement if we could get Lincecum instead.


It's looking less likely that a bona fide starter will be even available via trade. The M's need to make it a priority to sign Kuroda, then trade for some young pitching. Let Morrow, RRS, newly acquired pitching, et al, battle it out in spring training and let the best man win.

Posted by Lance

1:00 PM, Nov 29, 2007

Shannon Drayer of KOMO Radio is reporting that Bavasi held a pre-Winter Meetings news conference in which he said 1) the M's have offers out to free agents 2) the M's have trade proposals on the table and 3) the team must get more offensive production from second base.

Posted by Pete

1:19 PM, Nov 29, 2007

Can I just say that all this talk of Santana is starting to drive me crazy? It's fun for about 10 minutes, until you realize that Santana in an M's uniform is about as likely as Babe Ruth in an M's uniform.

I realize there are trade scenarios that might make sense, and it's fun to fantasize about Johan and Felix. But really, stop! The Mariners are not a baseball superpower (for lack of a better term). This deal simply will not be made. There are better, more-loaded teams with deeper minor league systems. Not to mention Santana has to decide he wants to spend the prime years of his career with a rebuilding team with no promising position players (especially in the absence of Adam Jones) coming through the system until the 17-year-old Carlos Triunfel.

IN WHAT ALTERNATE UNIVERSE DO YOU LIVE, WHERE THE MARINERS OUTBID THE ENTIRE WORLD FOR CY YOUNG???

Could we move on to something more likely? The hype is killing me.

Really, I'd love to see Santana at Safeco every five days as much as the next guy. But I'm willing to bet the farm that it doesn't happen. We really are talking about Roger Clemens here. Pedro Martinez.

Teams like the Mariners TRADE AWAY Randy Johnson, they don't TRADE FOR Johan Santana.

Posted by Matt from Issaquah

2:14 PM, Nov 29, 2007

Geoff,

I understand that the Santana trade price is really going to cost any team who lures him away from Minnesota. Your anaylsis of the situation has been the best that I have read to date.

That being said, I have another question. If Santana does in fact end up on the East coast (which sounds plausible), do you think that the Mariners have a shot at trading for Dan Haren? I know that teams usually are reluctant to trade within their own division. He seems like a pretty solid player, and he is only 27. Your thoughts?

Posted by david h

3:30 PM, Nov 29, 2007

Geoff, thanks for the extra detail on your opinion of Garza and Young. I'm still a little confused by your take on Jones. When discussing dealing him in a package for Santana, Jones is expendable partly because his future value is uncertain. But in saying you wouldn't trade him for Bedard, part of your argument is that he is a future franchise player.

Now, It's perfectly reasonable to say you would trade a future franchise player for Santana and not Bedard, but the reason for the different conclusions should be found in the variable, Santana instead of Bedard, not the constant, Jones. Instead, you diminished Jones' value (uncertain future) when saying you would part with him for Santana, and increased his value (future franchise player) when arguing you wouldn't move him for Bedard.


In other news, Matt from Issaquah: do you have any confidence in Bavasi dealing with Beane? That gives me shivers.

Posted by M's Defender

5:16 PM, Nov 29, 2007

Geoff I glad to see some of the M's faithful have finally had a V8 as the ad says and realizes that any Santana trade is a pipe dream of size of the Alaskan oil pipeline it's not going to happen move on.
Santana is destined to wear either Yankee pinstripes or Boston Red Sox.

Matt from Issaquah and David H while I would love to see Dan Haren in a M's uni considering what a pain he is on the mound againist the M's.
I don't have the confindence in Bavasi to make a deal for a discount on hamburger meat without paying for a T-bone steak price.
In either case neither need worry about that happening the trade or even Bavasi and Beane saying anything other than Hi to each other cause Beane won't trade within the division under no circumstances no matter what the offer is.

Posted by DrNaka

5:49 PM, Nov 29, 2007

'Does the KC signing yesterday of reliever Yasuhiko Yubuta make Kuroda any more likely to sign with the Royals? Who knows? But it didn't sound yesterday like the hurler was any closer to a decision after his agent, Steve Hilliard, apprised him of the situation at a meeting in Hiroshima, Japan.'

I don't think so. Hillmann was a week in Japan and wanted to meet with Kuroda. But they did not meet. Kuroda said that he want to go to a contender. KC is out I think.

'"Right now, I haven't decided anything," Kuroda told a Japanese newspaper. "Teams are on a line. Steve explained a lot to me, including (the) environment I am concerned about. I'll take time to think about my future."'

Kuroda is a good student to the MLB agent.
He is also very loyal to his (former) club Hiroshima Carp. HE must meet with Hiroshima FO to report that he has made his mind to cross the ocean officially. Than he can speak about MLB clubs of intrest.
It will be Dogers or M's because these are the teams he had a meeting together in Japan.

Now Mr. Yamauchi pushing for Kuroda I see that Lincoln is on a hot seat if M's cannot land Kuroda. Any chance that you can make a interview with Mr. Yamauchi? It will be much more interesting than the one with Bavasi.

Posted by brian

6:37 PM, Nov 29, 2007

When we look back in a few months at the trade rumors of today and seeing who Santana signed with and who the Twins received in return, it will be obvious that the M's didnt have enough to trade to get him and if we somehow do manage to pull it off, we will have depleted the young nucleus of the next 5-10 years. Our goal should realistically be to continue to strengthen our weak links as the younger kids develop into top players and recognize that between 80 and 90 wins is a likely best case for the next year or two. This will leave us on the fringe of the wild card and at least keep the fans interested in the team as we build off the improvements of the last few years. I would like to suggest that we flood Bavasi with realistic email proposals involving trades. His stretch with several free agent signings and being "out clevered" in some trades means we should help with suggestions.

The Pirates and Giants appear to have excess pitching and could use some of our young outfield talent or bullpen surplus. The Twins need a 2nd baseman and Lopez should be potentially available for a young pitcher in the Twins system. What do the A's need that would pry Haren from them? what do the Orioles require that might pry Bedard from them?

Between Morrow, Baek, RRS, Feiraabend, Rohrbaugh and young guns like Tillman on the way, we might be able to get through the 4th and 5th spot in the rotation next year, maybe Stottlemeyer can work magic with Ramirez even. But let's not give away Jones, Clement etc when the next five years could be quite exciting, especially when the large contracts like Sexson come off the books after the "08 season.

Lets get creative and help Bavasi with potential trade ideas

Posted by dan

1:16 PM, Nov 30, 2007

any trade for Santana would be a welcome trade.
Can sign a proven reliever in free agency.ie Affeldt. Why not unload sexson in the trade instead of one of one of the pitchers. Just think of a rotation with kuroda, santa, hernandez would be one of the leagues best.

Posted by Bill

1:43 PM, Dec 01, 2007

Has anyone noticed/mentioned that Dan Haren is being shopped by the A's?

A sinkerballer like him would be a nice compliment to our infield defense, but do the A's know something the rest of the league doesn't? Is he going into a contract year like Santan?

Posted by Brian Morehouse

10:32 PM, Dec 03, 2007

What is this attraction to Edwin Jackson? I see nothing in his history that makes him worth giving up a thing to acquire him. It scares me to see names like Jackson, or a fading Cliff Lee. Nothing is better than a "got to do something" Jeff Weaver or Horacio Ramirez!

Recent entries

Jul 4, 08 - 03:16 PM
Detroit Tigers at Mariners: 07/04 game thread

Jul 4, 08 - 12:28 PM
Holiday optimism

Jul 3, 08 - 11:13 PM
Better opposition tonight

Jul 3, 08 - 08:56 PM
Detroit Tigers at Mariners: 07/03 game thread

Jul 3, 08 - 05:45 PM
Hernandez throws, Rowland-Smith blogs, Clement struggles

Advertising

Marketplace

Advertising

Advertising

Categories
Calendar

July

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Browse the archives

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

Advertising

Buy a link here