not to be too picky, but Standford played Georgia Tech in the Seattle Bowl, not BC

Wasn't at least one of those games played at Safeco?

maybe greg nichols would be interested in this ONE event at The Key. As this could possibly be the worst bowl in the season why not make it a bit more interesting in an area football setting. jake would love the work there as he'll be seeing plenty of arena bowl in his future.

As for why our players are so young at certain positions, the SR class was Gilby's only class (quite subpar too) and the JR class was Willingham's first and less than two month/abbreviated class. What's so hard to understand that those two classes were far from ideal so not many starters come from them?

I wish UW allowed PE credits. Would make it a lot easier for JCs to get in, which would've balanced the classes. A starting JC WR and a starting JC DT (Anthony Atkins couldn't stay in school) would make people feel a lot better.

dawgfanjg,

Ya it was GT and actually wasn't a bad game. I was listening to it on the radio driving north by Safeco and stopped and walked right into the game. It was very empty. The Seattle Bowl makes me nervous. Shouldn't they call it the Emerald bowl and get Emerald nuts to sponsor? Who do they have a contract with these days?

A bowl in Seattle, wow I'm so excited !!! A high school stadium maybe more appropriate, the bleachers may look some what fuller, could bunch the people up for the camera....they do it for the movies. The Greed Bowl.

bkigg944, the bowl down here in SF is the Emerald Bowl and it is sponsored by Emerald Nuts. At first it was kind of confusing because I thought Seattle was the emerald city. How about the Jet Bowl and get Boeing to foot the bill. Or the Windows Bowl sponsored by Bilie G.

Bob you are right on the Nevada thing. But from an inside source Ty did get after the team during half time. To my understanding that was the only time he has said much at all. So maybe it was that pass or maybe it was Ty paying attention.

Kelemete?

The Seattle bowl is terrible. There's really nothing worse than going to support your team in a weak bowl game, in crummy Seattle weather, and then having low class Husky fans show up to root against you. Not that I expected anything different.

If you want it to be a good bowl play it Sefeco field, the locals might be excited to see a game there once a year as opposed to sitting in the rain at Qwest for 2 teams you don't care about where the stadium is half empty and you get soaked what a drag, locals and the teams fans that are in the game will know that if they come to Seattle they will not have to sit out in the rain, get two teams not affiliated with the Pac 10 so us locals can have a chance to see two teams we normally would not have a chance to see. Who wants to go see the 7th team from the Pac 10 or something like that how boring. Bring teams from other parts of the country.

the stanford seattle bowl was at Safeco, not Qwest. Where would the new bowl games be played.

what's up your @$$, Mikey?

A bowl game is the last thing Seattle needs to pursue.

The SSC is a joke nad everyone whose familiar with ithis organization knows it. What events have they brought to Seattle? And at what cost. What kind of ROI?

THe Seattle Bowl? The Washington Games? What retread idea will they come up with next?

Any thoughts on what these guys can do to make this one more successful? I'td be a lot of fun to have a regular bowl game in seattle.