The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds |


Our network sites | Advanced

Husky Football Blog

Times reporter Bob Condotta keeps the news coming about the Montlake Dawgs.

E-mail Bob| Husky Football forum | RSS feeds Subscribe | Blog Home

July 18, 2008 4:23 PM

Offenisve line ratings and a little more

Posted by Bob Condotta

A rumination on offensive lines and a couple of notes to send you into the weekend:

--- First off, ESPN's Ted Miller ranked the offensive lines today and has UW at No. 3, likely the highest any of Washington's position groupings will rank in any of these things.

That's the same spot we reserved for the Huskies in Lindy's, as well. In fact, we were prepared to put UW No. 2, behind only Cal, when Juan Garcia was hurt and we moved them down a notch.

Miller ranks the top three as Oregon, Cal, UW while Lindy's had it Cal, Oregon, UW. Either way, it points out that the Oregon-UW game will be a matchup of two of the better O-lines in the conference this season, though unfortunately for UW, Garcia will likely be unable to play in that game, lessening Washington's strength just a bit.

One big difference on that day, however, is that the Oregon O-line will be matched up against a UW defensive line that will go into the season considered among the weakest in the conference while the Huskies will go up against an Oregon D-line ranked among the best.

I would imagine Miller is getting ready to soon unveil his D-line rankings. At Lindy's, we had ASU first, Oregon second with UW, which has just one player returning with any experience in DE Daniel Te'o-Nesheim, dead last.

To me, that matchup --- Oregon's O-line vs. UW's D-line --- looms as the key to the game. Oregon figures to try to just ram it down UW's collective throat. UW will have to prove it can stop that to put some pressure on whoever Oregon's QB is. Otherwise, all the talk about Oregon's inexperience at QB may not matter much if all he has to do is hand or pitch the ball to somebody.

One caveat to the D-line rankings is that it's a pretty down year for that position throughout the conference, so the difference between being No. 2 and No. 10 isn't as great as it could be in other years.

Oregon, for instance, has just two starters returning on the D-line but earned its ranking in Lindy's due in large part to the fact that one of those returnees is one of the best in the nation in DE Nick Reed --- Oregon also returns DE Will Tukuafu and has two seniors likely to step in at tackle.

The Huskies moved the ball pretty easily on Oregon's line last year, however --- the Ducks had only two sacks in the game, both from the secondary (though admittedly it's probably a little dangerous to read much into UW's sacks allowed stats with such a mobile QB as Jake Locker).

Anyway, the rankings of the two O-lines as among the best in the conference points to a lot of points Aug. 30 in Eugene. The big question for the Huskies will likely be whether they can keep up.


--- First, someone wanted to know when camp starts. The first practice is slated for Aug. 4, a Monday. We should have a more detailed schedule of events coming soon.

--- Someone else wanted an update on Craig Noble. I haven't heard anything new. I was up at UW yesterday and the guys who were missing earlier are still missing from the bridge program --- it would be too late to get in now. Their status should become clearer once August rolls around and camp starts.

Comments | Category: none |Permalink | Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine

July 18, 2008 9:19 AM

Is Willingham's uncertain status hurting recruiting?

Posted by Bob Condotta

That was the question I asked in this story today.

As has been discussed here before, UW has no commitments for its class of 2009 while every other Pac-10 schools has at least four.

The answer? No one's completely certain, though recruiting analysts think it could be a factor while one recruit, Gino Simone of Skyline, said he thinks it definitely is playing a role.

Simone said Willingham's uncertain status "weighs heavily on a lot of guys' minds'' as they are deciding whether to commit to UW.

However, the state's top recruit, Deandre Coleman of Garfield, says that isn't an issue with him. He said he simply hasn't committed yet because he wants to take all of his trips.

As mentioned in the story, UW acting AD Scott Woodward also says he doesn't think it's a real concern. He also said there have been no talks about extending Willingham's contract, which runs out after the 2009 season. Obviously, nothing will be done on that until it's apparent which way this season is heading.

The one thing I've read on here and elsewhere, however, is that Willingham can earn that final season by what he does this year. The reality is that UW either gets rid of Willingham after this season, or commits to him for another three, four, five seasons. The discussion right now about whether Willingham's status is hurting recruiting is why they couldn't simply just keep him on his current contract for one more year. The conjecture would be even greater next season, and for recruiting purposes, the school has to either fish or cut bait with Willingham after this season.

In the story, I note that UW had at least one commitment by this time every year since the class of 2002. That includes the Class of 2005, though you wouldn't know it by looking at the wrapup for that year which shows that no Huskies who signed committed before Aug. 14.

However, UW did have two players commit by this day in 2004 --- cornerback Keno Walter-White and tight end Adam Grant --- who each then headed elsewhere once it was apparent Keith Gilbertson wouldn't be back. Walter-White, a JC transfer, played at Arizona State while Grant signed with Arizona.

Woodward is quoted in the article saying he thinks this will soon be a "non-story'' once a few recruits start rolling in. He and others pointed out UW has to be a little more selective this year with fewer scholarships to offer. Others pointed out the state doesn't have as many top-level recruits this year --- early commits tend to come from in-state. But given that UW apparently has at least 30 scholarships out there, that doesn't necessarily seem to explain all of it.

The reality, as is always the case with recruiting, is that there is no one, single answer. Much as people liked to portray last year's class as a sign of support for Willingham, a number of the big in-state recruits said they simply wanted to stay home --- not that they didn't want to support Willingham, just that staying home was ultimately the most important factor, as it often is for in-state players who commit to any in-state school.

As well with the recruits who haven't jumped on boat yet. Some, like Simone says, may be wary. Others, like Coleman, may simply want to take their time.

But another reality is that this will remain a story until the day someone does commit, growing a little bigger every day until that happens.

Comments | Category: none|Permalink | Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine







Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Browse the archives

July 2008