Home Forum Extra
Seattle Times business reporter Elizabeth Rhodes posts the answers to your real estate questions as they pop up during the week. Join this ongoing discussion, which also features reader reaction to real-estate articles appearing throughout The Times.
Home Forum, Seattle Times, P.O. Box 1845, Seattle, WA 98111
* Sorry, no personal replies.
July 16, 2008 7:30 AM
Why didn't PMI save lenders?
Posted by Elizabeth Rhodes
Q: I keep reading about the subprime mortgage meltdown, the subsequent foreclosures and lenders going out of business. I thought that private mortgage insurance (PMI) was supposed to protect lenders when borrowers defaulted. Why hasn't it?
A: Conventional wisdom says PMI is required on all purchases where the buyer has less than a 20 percent down payment.
However conventional wisdom got fudged during the recent wave of home purchases, when "creative financing" led to the issuing of what are now widely recognized as unsound loans. Here's what happened, according to Jeff Lubar, spokesman for Mortgage Insurance Companies of America, a trade group.
Large numbers of subprime borrowers who had less than 20 percent down got piggyback loans. That's a first mortgage for 80 percent of the home's purchase price, plus a second mortgage for an amount up to the remaining 20 percent. That circumvented the PMI requirement.
"The second mortgage was usually an adjustable-rate loan with a balloon payment (requiring complete repayment of that loan within a just a few years), and that's what got people into trouble," Lubar says. "Lenders would sell these loans with the idea that home values would go up, and that would take care of it because the owners could then refinance."
When values stalled instead, refinancing wasn't an option. Faced with loan terms they couldn't honor, owners defaulted instead. And with no PMI to protect them, lenders struggled and in some cases failed.
Jul 24, 08 - 08:00 AM
Too many sellers, too much competition, vex home seller
Jul 23, 08 - 07:30 AM
When former condo board members won't let go
Jul 17, 08 - 07:30 AM
Unsuccessful house seller considers trading homes instead
Jul 16, 08 - 07:30 AM
Why didn't PMI save lenders?
Jul 10, 08 - 07:00 AM
Contractor's damage has neighbor fuming

nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

- Flags were key link to cop slaying, bombings
- Suspect shot as city mourns slain officer
- Briefs | Soccer: New Mexico suspends hair-pulling player Elizabeth Lambert
- Bombs, guns found at home of suspect in Officer Brenton's slaying
- How an underdog named Mike McGinn took City Hall
- Huskies suffer another heartbreaking loss to UCLA
- McGinn pulling away as late ballots come in
- 3 Cascade Mountain passes close due to snow; more rain, wind expected Sunday
- Using anti-shooter tactics, civilian Army police officer brought down gunman
- Heavy snow in Cascades shuts down roads
- Suspect shot as city mourns slain officer
- Flags were key link to cop slaying, bombings
- The birth of 'Grunge,' in photos by Michael Lavine
- How do innovators think?
- 10 investing missteps to avoid
- 10 ways to take control of your health
- Bombs, guns found at home of suspect in Officer Brenton's slaying
- Danny Westneat | Lee the Horse Logger found slow wagon shrank tumor
- Tlingit heritage helps glass artist Preston Singletary break new ground
- How an underdog named Mike McGinn took City Hall








Posted by PayClayBennett
8:10 AM, Jul 16, 2008
"When values stalled instead" - depending on where you live, this might be more accurate written as, "When values crumbled".....
The whole lending game was predicated on quick and easy appreciation. 80/20, 80/10/10, 80/15/5 - that's how they were all done and very few poeple put money down on anything. The PMI was washed away by the loan combos as you mention - which brings up a very good point. A lot of these 80/20s had the same bank issuing both loans. It appears they took the same risks the borrowers did and therefore should pay the same price.
As a borrower, you are a customer of a lender who agrees to pay back a note at a certain rate under certain terms. The lender requires an appraisal to determine value and protect their positions. When the lender is willing to hand out 100% of a purchase price in a market that has already appreciated 30-40% in a short period of time - they are dumb. The borrower is a customer of that institution and I look at it as partnership. "Here, you buy this house for this inflated value - your payments are set for this period of time, and when you can't refi or sell to cover the drastic decline in your value and your inability to make payments, we'll come and take the house and sue you for any deficiency between current value and what you owe."
They took the same risk the buyer's did and made lots of money early - when it crumbled, it has crushed them just as it has a lot of buyers. That's how it should be - the consumers have zero market protection and the government's answer to helping the consumer is what? "No deficiency judgements on prime reisdences...".....what else? Nothing. Rates are still way higher than the hay day from a couple of years ago which contributed to this mess (cheap money made many things affordable, but also came in the form of adjustable loans - which hit maturation and blew folks out of the water - especially those with 5 properties and negative equity). They made the money cheap, gave 100% of value to most anyone, then jacked the rates while the builders over-built everything, saturating the market with inventory.
I don't think 20-30% appreciation annually is real, but I feel the same about depreciation. I bought a custom spec home with a construction loan in 2006. The value was determined to be, by multiple appraisers, $432K. I was buying the home for $332K with loan costs and constuction interest reserve adding up to $27K - $360K total cost at completion of construction, leaving me $72K of equity - nothing down due to the existing equity. No brainer, right? Nothing down, $70K check at the end of the tunnel....strong market, 30,000 person community with asperations of growth to a 100,000 in 3-5 years. Commercial going gangbusters, roads being paved, track house neighborhoods rising out of the dirt....
Anyway, long of the short - upon completion, the current appraised value is $350K - my adjusted cost is $360K as mentioned above. The market crumbled 20% from the start of the project to the end and what did the bank do to help me pay back the debt? Gave me an 8.25 interest only rate on $358K and charged 1% of the purchase price for property tax impound instead of getting the accurate figures from the county. My payment was $3093 and the current rates at the time were 6-6.5% on a 30-year fixed. Because the value had disappeared so badly, my rates jumped. Did the bank want me to pay them back or did they want to soak me before I foreclosed?
So - I quit paying them. They offered me many ways of paying back accrued interest with interest free payment plans on that amount, but they offered me nothing in regards to lowering my rate and actually making my second home payment affordable. Meanwhile the givernment has been saving banks and making concessions for these institutions in grand fashion. The consumer has received nothing.
Again - they took the risk same as the consumer, they pay the price same as the consumer. Only the government has assisted them and not us. It's a racket and although I have no desire to see our financial market weak or shaky, I do hope some of these banks crash and burn as they are now.
The government has no problem shelling out billions for Iraq and aiding other countries, baling out these banks, etc., but the consumers will continue to pay $4+ for a gallon of gas, $4+ for a gallon of milk, and crappy interest rates on depreciating real estate. I don't think McCain or Obama can fix it, but Bush has watch it be ruined and has the nads to say the markets are strong...where George? Which of your dumbass advisors told you this? It's truly sad and the one thing that most Americans had confidence in was the appreciating quality of their real estate. No more and the trickle down is just getting started....