Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Ed cetera

Join the informed, opinionated journalists of The Times' editorial staff in lively discussions at our blog Ed Cetera.

About the contributors| RSS feeds Subscribe | Blog Home

February 9, 2009 5:40 PM

Some New Bills in Olympia

Posted by Bruce Ramsey

Any legislator can “drop” a bill—that is, propose a new law. Here are a few Olympian ideas that caught my eye. I make no claim that these are the most important bills, or that you should take them seriously. But they are real proposals.

House Bill 1186, sole sponsor Rep. Maralyn Chase, D-Edmonds. This proposed law would apply to any retailer selling gasoline or diesel-fueled lawnmowers, string trimmers, leaf blowers, air compressors, chainsaws, turf equipment, lawn and garden tractors and similar off-road equipment of less than 50 horsepower. Retailers selling any of these items “must provide equal or greater shelf space to similar products that are powered by an electrical cord or a rechargeable battery.” Retailers would have to put up “signs describing the consumer benefits of choosing electric or battery-powered engines” if products with such “engines” (she means “motors”) existed. The standards for the signs would be set by the state Department of Ecology. Sales of gas and diesel-powered equipment would have to pay a 6 percent carbon-emissions tax. Estimated cost to consumers in 2010: $55.6 million.

House Bill 1638, sponsored by Rep. Tami Green, Assistant Majority Floor Leader, D-Steilacoom, and three others. This proposed law would begin the state licensing of colon hydrotherapists—a trade made fun of on Penn & Teller, and, more important, dismissed by many medical authorities. Here is the account on Wikipedia,which says, “No scientific evidence supports the alleged benefits of colon cleansing.” Estimated cost in fees to the state: $133,000 a year.

House Bill 1189, sponsored by Rep. Maralyn Chase, D-Edmonds, and Rep. Tom Campbell, R-Roy. The bill says: “A person who owns or operates a retail store may not provide a carry-out bag for free or for charge to a consumer unless the carryout bag is either a compostable plastic carryout bag, a recyclable paper carryout bag, or a reusable carryout bag.” The law would allow the grocer to give you a free plastic bag for fresh meat, dairy products, fruit, vegetables, ice or cooked foods, but not for canned, dried, boxed or frozen foods. This is tougher than Seattle's proposed ordinance, which, if approved by voters, would levy a tax of 20 cents on disposable plastic and paper bags at grocery stores. Chase and Campbell's bill would ban non-compostable plastic bags.

Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

Advertising

Marketplace

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Categories
Calendar

May

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Browse the archives

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

Blogroll