Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Ed cetera

Join the informed, opinionated journalists of The Times' editorial staff in lively discussions at our blog Ed Cetera.

About the contributors| RSS feeds Subscribe | Blog Home

June 19, 2008 4:18 PM

Tech Industry, Tech Brains: WA Ranked

Posted by Bruce Ramsey

The Milken Institute, in a new report here, rates Washington 5th among the states in “Science and Technology Assets.” The only other state nearby that scored higher was California, which was 4th. Oregon was 23rd, Idaho 27th, Montana 32nd and Alaska 44th. On the national ranking, Massachusetts was at the pinncale and Mississippi in the pits.

The index had five components. Washington scored 4th on two of them: Technical Workforce and Risk Capital and Entrepreneurial Infrastructure. We scored 8th in two measures, Research & Development Inputs and Technological Concentration & Dynamism, and 16th in one: Human Capital Investment. Tech companies have been saying for a long time that Washington doesn’t graduate enough scientists. We import them from elsewhere. Whether that’s a bad thing I’m not so sure. Somebody else pays for their education, and we get the benefit of their brains. Not a bad deal—if we can sustain it.

Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine

Submit a comment

*Required Field



Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Posted by Kris

11:59 AM, Jun 20, 2008

The MI report measures nothing measurable, worthwhile, or substantive.

The report is as phony as "pinncale".

Posted by TrainBrains

5:46 AM, Jun 21, 2008

We can't sustain it. As a nation, we need to graduate more scientists. As a state, we have a bright future if we can support and improve science and math education.

The US may not always draw brilliant minds from somewhere else.

If we want to keep our edge, our kids need solid math and science skills. It's no joke.

Posted by Peter

5:26 PM, Jun 24, 2008

Bruce,

Your comments about "importing scientists" misses the point - Washington State is failing our kids both in K-12 level and in higher education by not preparing them for 21st century jobs. It seems that if my child wants an appropriate education for this century's jobs she must most likely get it elsewhere.

As a parent I find this situation vexing, and I assume from the tone of your article that you are not a parent.

Posted by Ed Lazowska

5:58 PM, Jun 24, 2008

Each individual -- each voter -- needs to decide whether s/he is concerned that the kids who grow up in our state are not being prepared for the 21st century jobs that our economy is creating.

Bruce's view on this is clear. I'd encourage you to make up your own mind.

Posted by Bruce Ramsey

8:19 AM, Jun 25, 2008

To Peter:

I am a parent of a 17-year-old. I am in favor of a rigorous education and providing lots of opportunities for the smartest kids. That is not the same as saying that Washington state has an obligation to crank out as many PhDs or M.Ss, or whatever degrees and talents that industry in this state wants to employ. Talent is a national market and, increasingly, an international market.

Recent entries

Jul 30, 08 - 03:22 PM
Should puppies be banned?

Jul 30, 08 - 01:01 AM
Planet Obama

Jul 29, 08 - 05:55 PM
Notes on Finland

Jul 28, 08 - 01:30 AM
Obama's press

Jul 27, 08 - 12:00 AM
Summertime and the fishing is perplexing

Advertising

Marketplace

Advertising

Advertising

Categories
Calendar

July

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Browse the archives

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

Blogroll

Advertising

Buy a link here