The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds |

Politics & Government

Our network sites | Advanced

Postman on Politics

Chief political reporter David Postman explores state, regional and national politics.

E-mail| About the blog | From the archive| RSS feeds Subscribe | Blog Home

December 28, 2007 10:58 AM

E-mail raises questions about union effort for Edwards

Posted by David Postman

The head of one of the state's most powerful political unions is in the middle of a presidential campaign controversy. David Rolf, president of S.E.I.U. Local 775 sent an e-mail to fellow union leaders about how best to help Democrat John Edwards' campaign. As the New York Times reported yesterday, the effort was supposed to be independent of the campaign.

But the Edwards campaign may have expected the support of the group, Alliance for a New America, set up by a local of the Service Employees International Union. An Oct. 8 e-mail message circulated among the union leaders who created the group suggests that they were talking with Edwards campaign officials about "what specific kinds of support they would like to see from us" just as they were planning to create an outside group to advertise in early primary states with "a serious 527 legal structure."

You can read a PDF of Rolf's e-mail here. The NY Times reported:

The message discusses plans to swing as many SEIU locals as possible "into a pro-Edwards position" and to coordinate public endorsements with the Edwards campaign. The organizers "to discuss with the Edwards campaign what specific sort of support they would like to see from us" and list specific meetings scheduled between union leaders and campaign officials like David Bonior, the national campaign manager.

The paper said that Rolf was traveling and unavailable for comment. I'm checking with SEIU to see if I can reach Rolf today.

MORE: The national SEIU has not endorsed a presidential candidate this year. But a group of its locals announced its support for Edwards in October. The Iowa local was the big news that day, though Edwards was certainly buoyed by backing from all 10 SEIU locals involved in the announcement.

Dave Regan, president of a pro-Edwards local covering workers in West Virginia, Ohio and Kentucky, issued a statement today responding to the New York Times story. He said, in part:

There has been no coordination or discussion of our support for the organization's work with any individual candidate or campaign at any time.

Alliance for a New America is a 527 -- groups named after a section of the IRS code -- and as an independent expenditure group is prohibited by law from coordinating activities with candidates’ campaigns.

I wasn’t able to reach Rolf. But Adam Glickman, a spokesman for SEIU, said there was nothing in Rolf’s e-mail that indicates any sort of improper coordination with the Edwards campaign. He said he has talked with Rolf since the story ran and that Rolf is clear he never talked to the Edwards campaign about 527 activities.
In fact, Glickman says Rolf is not involved in the independent expenditures. He says that SEIU officials, like those in other unions, divide up between those who work on independent expenditures and seal themselves off from the campaigns, and others who remain legally able to talk to candidates and their staffs about allowable coordination.

He said that Alliance for a New America had already been created at the time Rolf sent out his e-mail, and that no SEIU local had yet endorsed the candidate.

“At that point no one is really making any strategic decisions. It was just listing a number of things that are obvious that the union could do for Edwards. That includes things you could coordinate and things you couldn’t coordinate.”

The endorsements came the week after Rolf’s e-mail.

There is more news developing around Alliance for a New America.

  • The New York Times reports on its political blog that campaign watchdog groups are “raising alarms’’ about SEIU’s involvement.
  • The Washington Post blogs about a well-heeled donor to the group.
  • RealClearPolitics looks at connections between Edwards and the group.
  • And ABC News’ Jake Tapper tries to put the Rolf memo in some context.

Digg Digg | Newsvine Newsvine

Submit a comment

*Required Field

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Posted by Piper Scott

3:44 PM, Dec 28, 2007

Amazing how often the SEIU is involved in political shenanigans of a dubious ethical nature.

There's an ethics complaint against a certain state senator pending in Olympia that accuses him of using his office and state resources to intervene on behalf of the SEIU in a collective bargaining dispute.

I filed the complaint.

Also, the King County Council's recent mental health levy ordinance is filled with provisions of dubious legality that violate the rights of both workers and employers under the National Labor Relations Act, all done at the behest of the SEIU.

Looks like the ghost of Jimmy Hoffa lives inside the bodies of some associated with the SEIU.

Estes Kefauver and Bobby Kennedy, where are you now that we need you?

The Piper

Posted by Publicbulldog

6:21 PM, Dec 28, 2007

They should just form a Labor party instead of hiding behind another name

Posted by TheTruth

3:40 AM, Dec 31, 2007

What? Democrats and Unions are partners in crime? They break campaign laws? Blasphemy Postman! Don't you know the first rule of the MSM is to never repost anything bad about a Democrat. And if you must, you don't identify the party and add also that Rpublicans too it too.


Posted by upchuck

11:17 PM, Jan 02, 2008

yeah and the swift boat 527 had no coordinating ties with bush either... the problem is not the campaign, it's the system. if presidential elections media campaigns didn't come with a price tag in the 100's of milions to the monopolies controlled by the corporate barons... i.e. if speech really was free, these problems would not exist.

Posted by Kay Parks

2:51 PM, Jan 23, 2008

I got a call from someone at the SEIU union office
last night - I, once again, asked them to stop
calling me at my office or my home - I had a "do not call" message put by my name in November, but
it obviously hasn't work. I told the union representative last night not to call again. He
said he had to call and tell me how the union wanted me to vote - I told him it was none of their business how I vote and I didn't care what
there opinion was. I'm a member of the union becuase I have to be in order to access Medicaid
Personal Care dollars to take care of my son! Joining the union wasn't a choice - you still had
to pay "your fair share". But one would think I
could request that they leave me alone! I emailed
David Rolf this morning and told him that if they
can't get me off their automatic dialer lists, I
was going to file an official complaint with the
State Attorney General....he hasn't responded yet.
Probably too busy compaigning!

Recent entries

Mar 14, 08 - 04:21 PM
The blog is resting

Mar 13, 08 - 03:30 PM
Forget money for Sonics this year

Mar 13, 08 - 11:47 AM
GOP lawmakers, but not Rossi, praise gov's flood work

Mar 13, 08 - 08:36 AM
Supreme Court rules against random school searches

Mar 12, 08 - 03:35 PM
The gracious lobbying community







Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Browse the archives

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007


Buy a link here