anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events

Between the Lines

November 04, 2004

Aside from four more years ...

… just what does George Bush's win mean? Well, let's start here:

Let me put it to you this way: I earned capital in the campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it. It is my style. That's what happened in the -- after the 2000 election, I earned some capital. I've earned capital in this election -- and I'm going to spend it for what I told the people I'd spend it on …
-- President Bush, today at a press conference

We'll have plenty of opportunity to deal with terrorism and our wars, so let's set them aside for now and look at the domestic concerns Bush mentioned today:

-- Reform of Social Security begins now, he said. By "reform," of course, he means privatization.

-- Tax "simplification." This means a so-called flat tax, which could be either the reduction of the income tax to one bracket or a switch to a "consumption" tax, another name for a national sales tax.

-- Legislation to limit damages in civil suits.

-- Regulatory "reform."

In addition, of course, there is a certainty that Bush will be appointing new justices to the U.S. Supreme Court and hundreds of judges to lower levels of the federal judiciary. And he will, no doubt, be replacing several members of his cabinet.

His domestic agenda certainly is ambitious, but really is just a consolidation of ideas he has been pursuing since he took office. The difference is that he now may have the strength to push through large chunks of it.

Which brings us to the "mandate" question. Did he get one or not? Well, 51 percent of the vote is hardly the sweeping victory that some Bush partisans would have you believe.

Here's one picture of what it looks like.

One percentage point over 50 is not the landslide victory scored by some presidents in the past (Reagan in 1984, Johnson in 1964 and FDR in 1932, for example). And it's hardly a ringing endorsement of a president who had huge support until his invasion of Iraq turned outto be a more difficult mission to accomplish than the president guessed. This is a purple nation, and Bush would be well advised to remember that.

On the other hand, Bush's opponents would be foolish to minimize the importance of his victory. The election was a referendum on the job Bush has done—and he won. He's the first president to be elected with a majority of the popular vote since his father in 1988. And while the accompanying Republican gains in Congress are not sweeping, they are significant. As Kevin Drum notes,

If the results had gone the other way, we'd be talking about them as a clear repudiation of Bush and everything he stood for.

Going forward, the big question will be how skillfully Bush employs the strengths voters gave him on Tuesday.

Posted by tbrown at 01:01 PM

And if you don't like the Bush agenda?

Well, here's one pretty funny proposal.

Posted by tbrown at 12:59 PM

 July 2006
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003

Aside from four more years ...
And if you don't like the Bush agenda?


Blogs to watch

Abu Ardvark
Andrew Sullivan
Atrios Eschaton
Best of the Web
Drudge Report
Joe Conason (subscription required)
Josh Marshall
Kaus files
No More Mr. Nice Blog
Real Clear Politics
The Corner
The Volokh Conspiracy
The Whiskey Bar

Mideast blogs

Salam Pax (Iraq)
G. in Baghdad
L.T. Smash (U.S. military in Iraq)
Lady Sun (Iran)

City blogs

L.A. Examiner

Africa blogs

Cathy Buckle

Media blogs

Dan Gillmor's eJournal
Media Whores Online


Newspapers online (guide to papers on the web)
International Herald Tribune
The Guardian U.K.
New York Times (free registration required)

Economy blogs

Brad DeLong

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2 home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company


Back to topBack to top